Recovery and Healing part 2: How

We must remember, they are the ones who dictate all trends and fashions. They try to appeal to US in order to get us to part with our money. They create an artificial value on all of their things in order to get us to buy them:

That Michael Kors bag? Worthless. 

Diamonds? Worthless.
Those shoes? Worthless.

Those viral videos telling us about the new musical sensation? Worthless. 

All things required to achieve mainstream appeal? Worthless.

Etc...You get the point.

We are doing this right now. We have spent a lot of money with Black businesses these past two years, and that's wonderful. We've done it consistently. And that's a beautiful thing.

We have to drop these mainstream standards and create our own. All of these are respectability politics in one way, shape or form. We have to look deeper. All that "glitters" is not gold. And that's one of the sayings they use to tell us what's good. And the real question is "What's good?" Nikki Minaj told us that, but some of us were looking at her package through supremacist eyes.  

I'm not mad at anybody for doing so, nor do I think I'm better than anybody for recognizing what I saw. I can not stress that enough. We can't help it.  I said separating oneself from the supremacy is going to be hard. But it is necessary. I'm still learning, and I know I am not perfect. I am conditioned in ways I haven't even begun to figure out. As far as I know, I might have just scratched the surface because each day, I find out something new. We have to accept the fact that we are not better or worse than anybody else regardless of economic situation, appearance, "intelligence", etc. I've been surprised by homeless people, by prostitutes, rich people, drug addicts, thugs, so called middle class,and poor people throughout every way possible. We as Black people are all in the same boat, or barrel, as the saying goes (Crabs in a barrel).  We know who built the barrel. We must go ahead and leave it. I know we can. We've got this. As I said, once we understand supremacy, all we have to do is jump out of it.  The easiest way to jump from it is through your mind. But you have to know what you're reading, and what you're learning, and how to learn and apply it first. I'm not saying disregard your degree from a primarily White institution because of "tricknology". Go ahead and keep that. You've earned it. You worked hard for that, and hard work should be recognised as such, no matter where it came from. But I'm saying reevaluate yourself, and mold yourself into something that doesn't engage in supremacy.  There will be no shaming about how you receive your education, be it by running the streets, trade or community college, online or brick and mortar four year university. All education is good education and I believe the sooner we recognise it, the better we will be. 

Again. We have to define what's good, and not use their standards as the benchmark because each time we've done so, we got burned.

The second way to jump out of it is through action. Again, this goes back to kissing yourself, but catching yourself in the act is the real trick. You won't see it, but when you do, you'll be mad.

And that's still okay. It's part of the process. You will be mad over and over and over again. But as long as we keep looking forward,acting with our money, and creating our own standards,we will be able to fully disengage. 

That's how.

Supremacy: Our Role and How We Play Along

I've gone in on respectability politics in several blog entries. I mentioned what respectability politics look like in detail (See the Key and Peele skit under number 3 in this link), but I never went in on what they are and where they come from.

That answer is in the title, and I'll tell you what it looks like. I already touched on what it looks like in the form of teaching:

Because they want to be the teacher in some cases, but don't want to learn anything new. They want to be the all knowing one, but won't expand on it at times. I think those are the people I have the most trouble with. I think we need to learn to teach each other instead of going for the student/teacher role, which I feel may be a bit Eurocentric at best, because some of those who use that model will find a way to talk down to people they don't think that fit the description of awake. They look at those who aren't awake as "sheep" or "lesser than" and it shows in their teachings . That outlook is essentially enforcing Supremacy once a person gets right down to it because they want to reach down from their podium or pedestal and give to those they feel are "lesser" than them.

And the self proclaimed teachers aren't willing to accept questions raised by the pupils, should they decide to ask questions in the first place. It's like they just want the pupil to absorb information and agree with them for fear of making the teacher feel or look dumb because the pupil forced them to think as well. As a result, the teacher gets irritated with the student, and says something mean. They might cuss them out. As a result, nobody learns. The teacher thinks the pupils are dumb, and the student is left feeling like, "Fuck all of this. I'm through." And they tune out. Or should I say "drop out".

And respectability.  This is why so called "conscious" folks will be quick to call other people "coons" if they parrot something they think that sounds like enforcing White supremacy, but will neglect to recognize supremacy within themselves.

If you listen real close, or read closely (in this case) some of what they say sounds like the stuff rich White republicans will say when it comes to women. They're fine with throwing women under the bus, but will discount that Black women have stood up for Black men in every instance, even in the Civil rights movement up until current times. Whole movements have been pushed to the forefront in order to tell people that Black men are not a monolith to the point of creating Youtube videos, but there are entire Youtube channels created by Black men that are devoted to shaming Black women and throwing them under the bus.  

Sandra Bland died by the hands of police brutality and she was a BLM supporter, but Black men were saying that she had an attitude. Nobody could pony up five hundred dollars to make bail for her in the first place, but she DIED in the jail cell because of it. They might as well have said, "She was too uppity."

In fact, during the Civil Rights movement, there was a person by the name of Claudette Colvins who was the first to deny her seat to a White person in the south. But because she didn't fit the respectability narrative, she was ignored after it was brought to the Civil Rights leaders of that era. Since Rosa Parks fit the narrative, she was the one who sparked the bus boycott. 

I've also seen posts of men complaining about Black women being the breadwinners in relationships. Somebody actually said that Black women are taking all of the jobs, and should be married and raising families, as if they actually believe the filth being slung about Black women is truth.

So let me get this straight. The problem is that the Black women are successful? That's the problem? One would think there would be no problem because I've seen many,many posts about Black men graduating college, inventing new procedures, and all kinds of accomplishments, but when it comes time for Black women to do a bit of shining, all of a sudden they should be raising families?!   Really? -_- 

And then when someone voices their concern about some things pertaining to Black men, somebody comes out of the woodwork to say "#NotAllMen" , which is the same as saying, "#NotAllWhitePeople" as if that needed to be said in the first place. It's the equivalent to saying #AllLivesMatter in response to #BlackLivesMatter. 

And when the issue is brought up, here comes the "What about us? What are you going to do for us?" Which looks like the following, " Heeeey!, White people die by the hands of police too. Where's our rally?" As if it is Black people's (or women's) job to organize a rally just so you don't have to feel left out. Start your own. Figure out what's wrong and go for it, and the people will come, or in this instance, figure out what's wrong and fix your own shit.  

But they left Sandra Bland high and dry, called her "uppity." ,which leads me into the next example:

If a woman doesn't wear enough clothes, you get this: 

and if she does, she gets this. Please read the caption under the pic to see what I'm talking about:



Sometimes, it seems a lot of Black men stay talking shit about women. It doesn't matter what we do. If we did do all they asked us to do, then they'd still complain. They'd say we think were 'too good' or 'not ghetto enough' (Yes. Unfortunately I've heard the second one before.). One of those instances is shaming a woman for enjoying sex, but they say they want a freak in the sheets and a lady in the street. Do they know that in order to become a freak in the sheets, one has to gain experience by having sex?

And we can't forget the complicity of folks who defended Rachael Dolezal, and how nobody brought up her husband's stake in the entire thing.  Here's an excerpt of the blog where I mentioned those who allowed this as well as those who ignored it:

The same people who defend her are the same ones who:

1. Believe that those were Michael Jackson's biological kids.
2. Gave such a pass to Bill Clinton because he "got head" under the desk of his White House office while he was president.
3. Let their White and other non Black friends say "Nigga" because they were the ones who gave them permission.
4. Didn't feel "Black enough" in the first place because other kids called them "sell out", "oreo", etc "because smart equals 'wanna be White'."
5. Married a light skinned person in hopes their children wouldn't be dark skinned like themselves.
6. Have a complex about Black women, but have voiced it through various negative behaviors towards them.
7. The ones who want to be accepted so bad by White people that they use the "black on the inside" argument to appease them.
8. The ones who secretly believe that White women are fragile and need to be coddled, cared for and protected.

     9. The ones who are afraid of White backlash against them. (job, etc)

... They want to compare her with Black women wearing blonde weave, skin bleaching, and straightening their hair. But this argument goes back to how they didn't fabricate entire racial identities to live lives as White people, nor did they fabricate hate crimes.

And that last bit was actually used as a legitimate argument as if they were making a valid point.

What is the root cause you ask? Here it is:

I think they battle between wanting to be seen as men, and Black men, so they adopt supremacy to the point of throwing black women under the bus. But only when they just want to be seen as men...like they want to put their color down just to be accepted. I see that attitude in corporate settings especially. 

And Black women do this to men as well. I see it in those "bitches and niggas be like" posts. I hear it whenever they describe somebody as "rachet" or "basic".  I hear it whenever they critique someone's appearance. I'll share with you a piece I wrote in a very early blog entry pertaining to this idea and you'll see how it works with supremacy. Fair warning, this entry is not as structured as the blogs have been lately. I was new to blogging and the main goal was to get these thoughts out of my head and in print. It basically goes into detail on how America loves to ascribe ratchetness to Black people, when the country itself was founded on being proud of ratchetness:

First, lets take a look at some of the various definitions of the word, "ratchet".  I was under the impression that it came from a rapper by the name of Hurricaine Chris back in 2009, but I found no actual definitions that traced it back to him even though that's where I thought I first heard the term.  However, I did find two interesting  definitions, listed on a blog which explored where the writer thought it came from. The blogger mentions that it may be possible that the first use of the word came from a character in the book "One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest". The character's name was "Nurse Ratchet". For those who hadn't read the book or need their memory refreshed, Nurse Ratchet was described as not a very nice woman. She was cold, calculating, manipulative, and controlling especially when things didn't go her way.  Some may go out of their way to describe her as a "bitch" but I'll get to that term a bit later.

The second idea the blogger had was that it came from the word "wretched", which can be described as deplorably bad , miserable or distressing.  It seems that the author was on to something here.

I looked a bit further and I couldn't help but start to see a pattern. Urban Dictionary.Com, Ny Mag.com, YahooAnswers, all imply that ratchet is a term meant to be applied to "ghetto",or "urban" people,(read Black people) in particular.  When I saw that, I said, "Get the fuck outta here!". One must not simply deem a whole section of people as "ratchet" just because the term was heard in a couple of songs by a particular group of people within said group who coined the term to describe generally tacky behavior. If all Black people are ratchet based on that, what does that make everyone else?  The real difference is what each sub culture calls this type of behavior, and how it is presented. For example, many movies have been centered around that behavior. Some television shows often have mean girls (or women in this case) nicely tucked into the story to keep things going.  In these cases, we are likely to watch these kinds of shows and are quick to give the character with ratchet behavior the title of "bitch" if she's a woman, or "mean girl" if she's not classified as a woman yet. Do we go around and label all women in the subculture represented here as ratchet ass females, or ratchet hoes? No, they get to be called mean girls, or bitches. And what about the guys? If they are ratchet, we call them douchebags, assholes,dicks (see 2nd definition) or alpha males. Don't front like this behavior is not celebrated in America by one sub culture of people verses the majority.  Not taking the time to look at both sides of the coin in attempts to demonize an entire culture is ratchet in itself.  America as a whole LOVES that crap. Why do some people reward this behavior? Why does the ratchet person get rooted for in the movies by some people? Why are people getting rewarded with the chance to be on a reality tv show with the promise of fame and money as long as they act as sorry as possible?  Why do we have ratchet cartoons? I can't act like I'm not guilty of enjoying a bit of ratchetness, in fact, that cartoon I listed is something I watch in small doses when I'm in the mood. Others watch Family Guy, South Park (which has some good social commentary sometimes), and many more. I just find it very interesting when Black people came up with the term, all of a sudden, all Black people get assigned to being ratchet.  Get the fuck outta here with that.

Not only can ratchet behavior be celebrated on TV, but it is also lauded as a sign of leadership in some circles (hence the alpha male title).  I already mentioned the Washington Post article  about what happens when mean girls grow up. The article also points out ratchetness in the work place and how the behavior may not necessarily be a bad thing. Let's be honest, we have all had a boss or co workers (male or female) who acted crazy from time to time. That behavior may include passive aggressiveness, snarkiness disguised as sarcasm,general bitchiness, and quite possibly verbal abuse. Last time I checked, that kind of behavior makes for a caustic workplace environment, and yet, some people can still get ahead using those tactics and are seen as straight forward, assertive and bold.

Maybe it really isn't like that for some people. Maybe we can blame their ratchet behavior on genes rather than poor parenting. Maybe they had O.D.D as kids and didn't grow out of it. Maybe we can come up with all kinds of euphemisms to describe otherwise tasteless behavior while ignoring the fact that it exists in this country. This way, we can sit on our high horses and call every Black person ratchet all day and every day while turning a blind eye to The Dunkin' Doughnuts incident sort of thing, this lady going batshit crazy over Obama's re election, the Huntington Beach Riots, the entire cast of Jersey Shore, Lindsy Lohan, Cory Monteith's death, and Heath Ledger's death. But waaaait. Celebrities don't coooouuunnnt. They're entertaaaaainers, and some of them are troooooubled. It's really haaaard to be a star. They have so much pressure put on them and some handle it better than others.  <<Get the fuck outta here and tell that to Whitney Houston especially after reading all of the comments on any article pertaining to her eventual death after the discovery of her drug use that was strewn all across the internet. Let Amy Winehouse know about it also. I guess she was different since people judged her anyway because she was White and from the UK. I just never heard anybody refer to her as ratchet.

By now, you're probably asking, "What's the reason why Black women talk that shit? There are two reasons :

Supremacy (read as, "Gotta get that Lot A slot on them other bitches and hoes by any means necessary."). 

And they're just plain tired. (Read as "That's why them niggas ain't shit")*. 

But that's just my interpretation of the situation.

* Added disclaimer. Those are not my views, but interpretations. I would not disrespect Black men in any instance in order to further my agenda. I see that attitude as more supremacy. Again, that's not US. That's THEM. I advocate that we don't copy them. That's all.

Black Survival part 4: Behavior codes- Do we need one set in stone?

I know what you're thinking. After all that talk I did about respectability politics, all of a sudden I think I have the ultimate code FOR respectability, right?

No. That's not what I'm talking about. Not in the least bit. I'm talking about solutions to help us further our cause without worrying about who is "worth" respect.  Somebody said I should produce 10 Black Commandments so I'll attempt to do so.  I'm going to outline it by using pieces of my life and what I've learned and or applied over time.


1. Never, EVER talk down to or mistreat those who you aren't as fortunate as you regardless. This works mostly on a material level.  Remember, regardless of that person's situation, they are still a person. No matter what they look like, they still deserve to be treated as such. This is essentially the idea of what equality was supposed to look like, but unfortunately, that idea was written by slave owners, so we mustn't let folks who idealize those men get the chance to dictate what equality looks like and what it is. All they did was enforce supremacy. That's it. And talking down to other people is another way to enforce it. That's their thing. They invented it.

On another note,  I've noticed there is a lot of insecurity placed on said lesser person as if one should stand next to them or be seen with said person, it makes them look bad. One must remember, "I am the only person who can make myself self look bad. Another person should never be able to have that power over me." 

2. Ask for help. Now I've had a lot of issues with this myself. I blame my toxic relationship with American Individualism for that. American Individualism is the "I got mine, what's wrong with you? mentality".  But I recognise it for what it is, and I'm willing to do what it takes to divorce myself from the idea.  This idea is not limited to yourself as a solitary person. This can be used in familial relationships as well. For example, I really like the idea of extended family, where aunts,uncles, cousins, etc can stay with you (and vice versa) for a period of time. This will allow them to get back on their feet if needed, it can also help a student fresh out of high school to the point where they could go to a state college, have a free place to live, and they could work while in high school as long as they keep their grades up and adhere to house rules. This could allow them to save up some funds for a decent vehicle to get them to school, and run errands.  Not only that, the kid will most likely not end up in debt.

If you have aunts and uncles living with you and everyone is working, the rent/mortgage could be split up evenly between the adults. This will allow each adult to pad their bank account and save more money for any other expenses like purchasing a home, starting a business, etc.  As a result, this can happen. I'm sure some of you have seen this video floating around facebook, but if not, this is an example:

3.  Money over everything is NOT the business. That mantra belongs to America, and history has proven time and time again, that America doesn't include Black people. Sure, we need money to exist in this capitalistic society, but "at what cost"?   Now I don't really watch Key and Peele like that, but the Slave Auction skit comes to mind:

Look at it closely. They start off being glad they aren't getting sold because, "Fuck that!". But then they start talking bad about the guys getting bought from Lot A. They start to belittle those on Lot A as they continue to get passed over. Then they start feeling "left out". They start looking at Lot A as the better slot. They want to be on Lot A. That could be read as wanting to be accepted. Then they get mad. They start talking to the crowd about their choices as if they had no idea what they were looking for. And then they sell themselves all the way out. They start saying they're docile, they can sleep in a bucket, they're strong, magic, etc.

And that's the entire problem right there. These dudes just summed up what it looks like being Black in America. We're not accepted until it starts to bother us. When it bothers us,some of us will sell all the way out regardless if we're all in the media or going about our private lives. Some will get accepted until mainstream America is done with us, and some won't. In this instance, the auctioneers left and they were never accepted.

But in reality, Key and Peele are on TV and are widely accepted for a lot of offensive skits where Black people are the butts of the jokes, one of which is the one I'm referring to. In fact, people became so offended by these guys to the point where Huffington Post picked up on it. And when the comedy team were confronted about their skits, they pointed to the fact they were half Black in order to distance themselves from the whole thing.
The skits look like the mirror they're holding up to themselves, and a lot of Blacks, on and off screen which shows why respectability politics are detrimental.  In fact, respectability politics run so deep that after watching the skit, I wondered if the creators even knew the depth of what they were doing as a whole, and whether or not they know exactly what it looks like. Anyway, on to number 4.

4.  A person has to learn to grow. One isn't simply born knowing everything. Everybody is dumb to somebody else. We must teach each other all day everyday in order to prevent the same mistakes from happening. See number 1 in this list, and my post on being woke to get the gist of the full concept, which leads me into number 5.

5. Be able and ready to accept constructive feedback, and know the difference between constructive feedback versus somebody talking a bunch of foolishness. For example: If I'm at work, and I get told that I did something wrong that could jeopardize the company, then my job is to find out exactly what I did wrong, know what I need to do to make it right, make it right , and then not make the same mistake again. Or, if I want feedback on a track that was poorly mixed, and someone informed me of that shortcoming, then I have to learn how to mix it properly or have it done professionally. I can't just say, "YOU'RE JUST A HATER! FUCK YOU THEN!" and leave it at that.

Now if someone said something along the lines of, "Your teeth are crooked. You should get that fixed." Then that would be foolishness. A person could get their teeth fixed, but that's a matter of appearance and personal preference, which doesn't affect the quality of work nor does it jeopardize anybody or anything in particular, nor does it make them "credible" or "respectable" (there's that respectability politics again!).

6. Do you and own it completely. When I say this, I mean, don't worry so much about what other people are doing. Be yourself. For example, if you make music, don't worry about what sound is hot right now. Make you come out of that mic and own it. Own the style, own the sound, and personalize the hell out of it. I don't just mean yell your name throughout the track, or watermark the beat (the latter half should still be done for business purposes), but I mean create something that only you can produce. Do it through all aspects of your life, (home, work, school, etc).

7.  Ask questions. One must be objective and be willing to ask themselves, "who, what, when, where, why, how and which" throughout all aspects of our lives. 

8. Seek different approaches, and apply that to everything you do . This goes back to the story about learning math in my "woke" post, and why seeking different approaches is important. :

One of my parents tried to beat the lesson into me, and the other was able to successfully teach me in five minutes. I learned two lessons: I learned math, BUT I also learned to never ask the abusive parent for help ever again. The same thing happened with learning how to read. These methods could be used to teach anybody regardless of whether they are a child or a senior citizen as long as they are open to it. Teach them while they are young for best results, but always remember that grasping concepts is not something that should be limited to children. They will grow and their foundation will be strong, or they would be able to strengthen and repair that which is faulty. Make the lesson fun. Learn from each other. Accept questions. Look for answers together and share them with each other.

9. Always be solution oriented. Be prepared for anybody and everybody who says, "Okay, now what do we do since you have all of the answers?" This right here is why all of my blog entries have solutions in them even though I admittingly talk a lot of shit. 

10. Always think about everything. Critical thinking is a must. First, Let's take a look at that definition of "critical thinking" Definition 2c is as follows: 

c :  exercising or involving careful judgment or judicious evaluation <critical thinking>

This way you know which questions to ask and how to find solutions in the first place. A person can't ask for help, learn, seek different approaches, accept constructive feedback, be objective or solution oriented if they don't have the critical thinking skills needed to do so in the first place.

How to use these and do we need someone to guide us:

The short answer to whether or not we need someone to lead us is NO! We are not a monolithic people. We are our own selves, we just happen to share similar skin tones. To imply that we need a leader is to imply that we can not think for ourselves. If you look at American history and Black people, the leaders have been sabotaged, from Malcolm, Martin, Marcus, and to the current people who claim themselves to be leaders of the so called "Black community" such as DeRay Mckesson, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.

Can this be used as the base to create another religion for Black people?

No. Because all it'll do is create divisions between those who worship differently (as if there wasn't enough of a division between Christians, Atheists, Baptists,Hebrew Israelites, and NOI members as is). BUT if a person wanted to take these commandments into consideration and add them to their core beliefs, then by all means, feel free to do so.

As usual, I'm open to constructive feedback, solutions, and questions. Let me know what you think, or whether or not you'd like to see these expanded and more fleshed out.

As always, thank you for reading. 

Expanding on Random Thought #6- On Being "woke" and solutions

I saw this on my feed yesterday and I felt the need to say something about stuff like this:



My heart broke in several pieces, and I was in shock. I was in shock because the person who posted this picture used this woman's situation to shame her for her situation. The person who took this pic did NOT try to help that woman. They didn't try to find out who she was, nor tried to find out what's going on with her case, nor tried to get something set up so she'd be able to get her babies out of the street. But I know this picture is out here like that, and so is her business for the sake of shaming her and her situation. The person who took this picture is the problem. On top of that, somebody took this picture to put out a self serving meme to make them look like they're doing good. Instead, they got this woman's business out here like this. In the comments, some people went so far as to shame her for being pregnant as well.  I went through as many shares as I could in order to find out some information on this woman to see if anybody knew who she was. I found nothing, so, I took it upon myself to do a Google image search  (where you can save an image to your computer, and then drag and drop it into the Google image bar)and it turns out the picture is from the Dominican republic. She is Hatian and has been forced out of her country. But the person who took the time to type that caption over the pic for the purpose of shaming folks and getting likes is problematic.

Maybe, just maybe if people would quit doing this type of shit (taking pictures just to shame Black people instead of trying to help said people) something great could happen. But naw. People want to take pictures and put people's business out there like that under the guise of being "woke". On that note, today, somebody asked me the following: When did I first become "woke"?

That term is something I struggle with. Here's why:

I guess I could say it was in 2006. And it was a very slow and steady awakening. And I still can't say that I am actually "woke" because back then, I found out some stuff, and that was just the tip of the iceberg. I had no idea about what I didn't know. Looking back, I thought I was BIG. But now, I feel even smaller than before, and if I fast forward several years down the road and look back at 2015, I might say I was still asleep then, and I might say that I'm dumb now. I can't really call it.

These past few years have been very scary for me. They have left me feeling like the literary description of a person detoxifying off of hard drugs after many years of use. They have left me sick. They have left me tired, dried up, beat up, confused, angry, and a host of other feelings. I've been questioning a lot of so called "woke" people and the methods they've been using in order to try to wake people up. I've been feeling pissed off, irritated and depressed for a while now. And then this showed up on my feed:




I have to remember this myself. And it's a lonely road as well. And the more I learn, the more trouble I have.

BUT I think the problem could be with people who call themselves "woke" most of all. Because they want to be the teacher in some cases, but don't want to learn anything new. They want to be the all knowing one, but won't expand on it at times. I think those are the people I have the most trouble with. I think we need to learn to teach each other instead of going for the student/teacher role, which I feel may be a bit Eurocentric at best, because some of those who use that model will find a way to talk down to people they don't think that fit the description of awake. They look at those who aren't awake as "sheep" or "lesser than" and it shows in their teachings . That outlook is essentially enforcing Supremacy once a person gets right down to it because they want to reach down from their podium or pedestal and give to those they feel are "lesser" than them.

And the self proclaimed teachers aren't willing to accept questions raised by the pupils, should they decide to ask questions in the first place. It's like they just want the pupil to absorb information and agree with them for fear of making the teacher feel or look dumb because the pupil forced them to think as well. As a result, the teacher gets irritated with the student, and says something mean. They might cuss them out. As a result, nobody learns. The teacher thinks the pupils are dumb, and the student is left feeling like, "Fuck all of this. I'm through." And they tune out. Or should I say "drop out".  And that right there is what we're dealing with.

This is the very same problem with the school system. They present this teacher, pupil , woke/sleep superior/inferior, subordinate/insubordinate model that we emulate unknowingly. We can all learn from each other. And we can learn from different approaches. We can ask questions, not to be mistaken as being contrarian, but to gain another approach or find a way to approach something from another angle especially due to the complexity of the topic. Now one must be careful not get that confused with someone who just wants to debate and not learn anything. Those situations are easy to spot, and can be weeded out.

 Google "Concern Trolling" to see what I'm talking about. Basically, it's when somebody asks a question or presents a situation they really don't want to know the answer to for the sake of feeling "right". A great example of that is, "Why can't there be a White only television channel? Black people have one. If we had one it would be racist."  

Or it could come in the form of a backhanded comment or post. It could come in the form of passive aggressiveness. These are tools used to keep any real conversation or action from happening.  As far as the first picture goes, not only does it enforce Supremacy, but it's a method of concern trolling because a bunch of people shared it but nobody tried to find out anything else about her.

For those who ask me what I'm going to do about this I'll tell them the following:

There are solutions sprinkled throughout this writing. Change the teaching method and people will learn better. I use this to teach children, and I learned it when both of my parents tried teaching me math. One of my parents tried to beat the lesson into me, and the other was able to successfully teach me in five minutes. I learned two lessons: I learned math, BUT I also learned to never ask the abusive parent for help ever again. The same thing happened with learning how to read. These methods could be used to teach anybody regardless of whether they are a child or a senior citizen as long as they are open to it. Teach them while they are young for best results, but always remember that grasping concepts is not something that should be limited to children. They will grow and their foundation will be strong, or they would be able to strengthen and repair that which is faulty. Make the lesson fun. Learn from each other. Accept questions. Look for answers together and share them with each other.

And for God's sake, whenever you see some posts like the first pic shown, do a Google Image search. Try to find out who they are and what's going on with said person. Don't shame them, and also find out any information you possibly can to help said person and to raise awareness. Relaying information and taking action could save several lives. If we all did this, the possibilities would be better than where we're sitting right now.

As far as the family in the first picture's situation goes,  I'm not sure what we can do over there, when we have a lot of problems over here in The States. There's an old saying that if a plane is crashing and the oxygen mask comes down, we need to breathe oxygen first and then let other people use it. We've got to save ourselves before we can save others because we have to be alive to do it.

We also say it takes a village. We need the village back. And once we rebuild the village, we need the town, and the city. THEN we might be able to pool our resources together to build other countries, because we're hurting over here. We can't follow America's model. They run around without fixing their own shit first. Once we fix ours, then we can do that. Until then, we'll always be scattered and running around.

But where is the village?  At this moment, it looks like our villages are online. But how do we make self sustainable physical brick and mortar villages without succumbing to: being priced out by overcharging for utilities and using that to seize property, absent landlords buying up property and letting it fall into disrepair so a big developer could buy it for cheap, driving up the taxes and push the original residents out? 

That sort of thing has been done in several cities including Baltimore, Philadelphia, Detroit, and St. Louis. I think that right there is our biggest hurdle.

Random Thought #6

On Being "Woke"

I ran across this poem, and it brought up some feelings. Some feelings I've had for a bit of time, but have become extra apparent these past two years. Take a listen and then continue reading:

A few days ago, I had a conversation about the idea of being "woke" with a friend of mine. I noticed things about people who say they're "woke" and I paid attention. In fact, I paid so close attention, I started seeing things that didn't really make sense to me. I noticed a lot of people actually think they're kicking knowlege,but in reality, they're just regurgitating stuff.

Stay with me here, trust me:

 If those who say they're "woke" really do some research beyond youtube videos and conscious facebook pages, they'd find out some crazy stuff. Stuff that'll scare the shit out of themselves. They'll find out that White supremacy is so invasive that even the most so called conscious person will echo the same sentiments and not even notice. They'll find out the extent of it, the depths in which people have gone to defend it, and they'll find out their role. And they'll be confused. Confused because of what they thought they knew is a lie. They'll be mad, they'll be anxiety ridden, tired, and depressed. And when they think they're done feeling like that, they'd find out that's just the beginning.

Waking up isn't fun. It's very scary. It's a hard road to hoe, and it's a long dark road. And there is no finite depth to it. And they'd have to really untangle themselves from the fuckery. And that's not easy. And when they think they're finished, they're still just waking up from that particular sleep. There is no turning back.

A lot of people who think they're "woke" just want an echo chamber to spread vague concepts of what they think being "woke" looks like. That's not what "woke" is. That's a circle jerk.

For the record, I am not proclaiming myself to be "woke". However, I will say that I will always be learning,paying attention to my surroundings and people. I'm learning some really cool stuff, but I'm also learning stuff that's horrible. Stuff so horrible that I can't even begin to explain the depth of it because I'm still trying to figure out where I sit in it and what I'm going to do about it.

That being said, I can not call a person a sheep. Because everybody is and was there at some point. I'm just a sheep whose done a bit more research through reading, as well as internal reflection. I can't proclaim to be fully knowledgeable and grown without knowing exactly what to do in this framework I'm stuck working with. I'm not sure I even want to work within this framework anymore.

I can't say where I'm going, or where is up. But I can say that something different is needed.

But what, where, when , how, and which will need to change? I think I have a very firm grasp on what needs to change, but the how is killing me because each solution I come up with, I'm met with an obstacle that I'm not sure I could make my way over. I don't think it's possible, to be honest.

Obligatory 9/11 post

I can not feel bad for The United States. I feel bad for all of the people who died because they were sacrificial lambs in a hoax. I feel bad for Muslims because they get treated like shit everywhere they go because of what the women wear, and for them not worshipping Jesus. I feel bad because a douchebag somewhere out there has to parade a Muslim apologist to denounce what happened on 9/11 even though it really was an excuse for the states to go to war. I feel bad for brown men with long beards because some dumbass can't tell the difference between someone who happens to be Brown vs someone whose Muslim. I feel bad for the soldiers who were duped into hating people and fighting for a circumstance that really had nothing to do with them. I feel bad they were used as bodies in order to obtain oil.

The patriotic circlejerk disgusts me. I can't be sympathetic at all for the US government and any supporters of it. As far as I'm concerned, 9/11 marks the day the citizens of an entire country got punked.

I started not to write anything about this fake ass holiday but after all of the hell that has been going on these past two years people have the nerve to still be playing fake patriot after the fact. They need to GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE WITH THAT BULLSHIT. For real. The police can kill Black people with reckless abandon and justify it with bullshit like, " they were too mouthy", "they ate and smoked marijuana while in jail", or any other bullshit they see fit while crying wolf about Black Lives Matter being a terrorist group while organizing go fund me pages in the name of bigotry, and people want to kumbaya their way into feeling American?!

Ferguson Timeline and the politician's role in the current police brutality mess. Part 3

Recap:

In the previous blog, I took the time to focus on the timeline of the politicians and the death of the Missouri Auditor.

Since then, more and more people have stepped down, have successfully attempted suicide (according to police officer accounts), or attempted to do so:


March 11, 2015
According to The Guardian, Ferguson Missouri's Mayor, James Knowles said, once the former police chief steps down,"Jackson would receive a year’s salary in severance pay. The chief was paid $95,512 (£64,000) a year, according to figures previously released by the city. Knowles also said the city manager, John Shaw, whose departure was announced on Tuesday, would receive his full $120,000 salary as severance."

June 27, 2015

Enter the former Missouri House Member Rep. Genise Montecillo, who had attempted suicide according to officers of the St. Louis County Police Department. She had been found in her apartment in south St. Louis County at 9:51am. She served her third term and had been on the House Budget Committee. She had been raising funds for her 2016 reelection after serving her third term, and she taught in the Special School District for 24 years, according to the St. Louis Post Dispatch. No further details regarding her suicide attempt had been released at that moment in time.

Former Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson stepped down, and is still angry over it. According to the STL Today, "To keep his mind off of Ferguson, he said he has done private security consulting for a Colorado-based company. Otherwise, he tries to fly his plane, a Cessna 175, and ride his motorcycle.
"I'm still really down," he said. "I have a lot of anger over all of this, and I don't get angry."

According to the DOJ Report, Jackson was the one that reported the following revenue increases for the years 2011-2013:




Jackson was able to afford a Cessna 175 and maintain a pilot's license on the same salary mentioned in the previous Guardian article.   (archived)

August 08, 2015

Mary Ann Twitty was rehired as a county clerk in nearby Vinta Park after originally being fired for racist e-mails, and fixing ticket amounts for people.

August 10,2015
 
Darren Wilson surfaces and shows the country what kind of man he really is.

That being said, a lot of what he says stands all the way out in this New York Times article and will be commented on in bold print:
"In 2009, Wilson got a job in Jennings, a town on Ferguson’s southeastern border, where ninety per cent of the residents are black and a quarter of the population lives below the poverty line. “I’d never been in an area where there was that much poverty,” Wilson said. Interacting with residents, he felt intimidated and unprepared.

A field-training officer named Mike McCarthy, who had been a cop for ten years, displayed no such discomfort. McCarthy, a thirty-nine-year-old Irish-American with short brown hair and a square chin, is a third-generation policeman who grew up in North County. Most of his childhood friends were African-American. “If you just talk to him on the phone, you’d think you’re talking to a black guy,” Wilson said. “He was able to relate to everyone up there.”

Wilson said that he approached McCarthy for help: “Mike, I don’t know what I’m doing. This is a culture shock. Would you help me? Because you obviously have that connection, and you can relate to them. You may be white, but they still respect you. So why can they respect you and not me?”

McCarthy had never heard another officer make such an honest admission of his own limitations. At the same time, he sensed a fierce determination: “Darren was probably the best officer that I’ve ever trained—just by his willingness to learn.”

McCarthy wasn’t surprised that Wilson had difficulty interacting with residents. Police officers are rigorously trained in firing weapons and apprehending suspects but not in establishing common ground with people who have had different experiences. “If you go to an academy, how much is on that?” he asked me. “Basically, nothing.” A recent survey by the Police Executive Research Forum revealed that cadets usually receive fifty-eight hours of training in firearms, forty-nine in defensive tactics, ten in communication skills, and eight in de-escalation tactics."
------
 So Wilson didn't know how to talk to or act around Black people, so he trained with a guy that was described as having the ability to speak in a Black vernacular over the phone, and "relate to everyone up there"?
------
For several months, McCarthy taught Wilson how to walk the beat—coaching him to loosen up, joke, and curse occasionally. He should avoid “sounding like a Webster’s Dictionary,” never condescend, and never expect people to rat. At first, Wilson says, residents laughed at him, but he followed McCarthy’s advice to “just keep going.” By the end of the training, Wilson said, he “was more comfortable” on the streets. McCarthy told me, “There is so much distrust in the African-American community toward the police.” The only way to overcome it was by establishing bonds with people. McCarthy, who is gay, said that he understood what it meant to be marginalized. “In the United States, where everybody is supposed to be equal, I’m not. So that’s a major thing.”

McCarthy helped Wilson, in part, by letting him make mistakes. One night, they were patrolling a neighborhood where burglary was common. Wilson saw a car idling on the side of the street, and McCarthy didn’t object when Wilson pulled over and asked the driver to show I.D. Wilson ran a check on the man’s name; nothing came up, so he let him go. Later, McCarthy asked, “What would’ve happened if you’d found a gun?” Wilson said that he would have arrested the man. McCarthy asked him what his case for probable cause would have been, and Wilson couldn’t answer. “You’d be screwed,” McCarthy said.
----
So the mistake was letting the man go after running his ID and finding nothing? It sounds like McCarthy told Wilson to escalate situations based on "probable cause". Now what would that probable cause be?
----

"Wilson recalls hearing “old-timers” talk about racism in Jennings’s past, but their stories didn’t make a vivid impression on him. McCarthy, however, said that in the seventies and eighties the Jennings police “did not play.” He added, “Basically, they’d beat you.” During that period, many blacks from St. Louis moved to North County. Numerous towns there went from being majority white to being majority black. The police forces remained almost completely white.

McCarthy showed me several police logs from those decades, and many entries documented bigotry on the part of Jennings authorities. In April, 1973, a lieutenant described a holdup that had occurred near the police station. The suspects were two black males. At the bottom of the entry, someone had written, “Men, you better leave your wallets at home. Niggers are going to come in the police station next and rob us.” An entry from December, 1979, described an eighteen-year-old black male who was believed to have been involved in the shooting of a police officer but was then released, “due to his lack of mental capacity.” Below this, someone had scrawled, “Kill the Fucker.”
-----
That was in the Jennings Police department's records. Apparently they thought it was okay to include racism in the records, as well as threaten to kill people. That being said, how many people have officers actually killed after the people get released?
------

McCarthy said that police officers resist discussing racism, past or present. “If an officer speaks out, they are ostracized,” he said. “They don’t want anything negative to be out there. But we’re humans—there’s gonna be negative. Be honest about it. If you acknowledge it, that’s the first step.”

Wilson strongly disagreed with McCarthy about this. He granted that, in North County, the overt racism of past decades affected “elders” who lived through that time. “People who experienced that, and were mistreated, have a legitimate claim,” he told me. “Other people don’t.” I asked him if he thought that young people in North County and elsewhere used this legacy as an excuse. “I think so,” he replied.
-----
 So after reading a sample of the records in Jennings that read "Kill The Fucker" after releasing person who was deemed mentally unable to commit said crime, Wilson STILL eschewed past racism and called the legacy an "excuse" for the young people in North County and anywhere else to feel the way they currently feel regarding police? ? Hmmm.
------
“I am really simple in the way that I look at life,” Wilson said. “What happened to my great-grandfather is not happening to me. I can’t base my actions off what happened to him.” Wilson said that police officers didn’t have the luxury of dwelling on the past. “We can’t fix in thirty minutes what happened thirty years ago,” he said. “We have to fix what’s happening now. That’s my job as a police officer. I’m not going to delve into people’s life-long history and figure out why they’re feeling a certain way, in a certain moment.” He added, “I’m not a psychologist.”
----
So an officer has to remove themselves from the people they serve in order to do a "good job"? Hmm.
---
Wilson said that, despite what he’d said about experiencing “culture shock,” race hadn’t affected the way he did police work: “I never looked at it like ‘I’m the only white guy here.’ I just looked at it as ‘This isn’t where I grew up.’ ” He said, “When a cop shows up, it’s, like, ‘The cops are here!’ There’s no ‘Oh, shit, the white cops are here!’ ” He added, “If you live in a high-crime area, with a lot of poverty, there’s going to be a large police presence. You’re going to piss people off. If police show up, it’s because it’s something bad, and whoever’s involved can’t figure out the problem for themselves.”
---- 

More distancing himself from the community he serves. It's all high crime, poverty and not much else I guess.
---

"When Wilson was thirteen, he stopped trusting his mother altogether, because she stole funds that she had helped raise for his Boy Scout troop. He worried that she would steal what little money he made working summer jobs, so he opened two bank accounts. The first, which had almost no money in it, was a decoy. He put his real earnings in the second, secret account. Wilson also tried to preempt his mother’s stealing. Once, he warned a friend’s parents not to let her inside their house, because she would surely find a way to steal their identities and max out their credit cards."

Followed up with this:

Good values, Wilson insisted, needed to be learned at home. He spoke of a black single mother, in Ferguson, who was physically disabled and blind. She had several teen-age children, who “ran wild,” shooting guns, dealing drugs, and breaking into cars.

Several times, Wilson recalled, he responded to calls about gunfire in the woman’s neighborhood and saw “people running either from or to that house.” Wilson would give chase. “It’s midnight, and you’re running through back yards.” If he caught the kids, he checked them for weapons, then questioned them. He recounted a typical exchange: “ ‘Why you running?’ ‘Because I’m afraid of getting caught.’ ‘Well, what are you afraid of getting caught for?’ ‘I don’t know.’ ‘Well, there’s a reason you ran, and there’s a reason you don’t want to get caught. What’s going on?’ ” Wilson said that he rarely got answers—and that any contraband had already been thrown away. Once, he arrested some of the woman’s kids, for damaging property, but usually he let them go. In his telling, there was no reaching the blind woman’s kids: “They ran all over the mom. They didn’t respect her, so why would they respect me?” He added, “They’re so wrapped up in a different culture than—what I’m trying to say is, the right culture, the better one to pick from.”

And this. The interviewer called him out. but check out his reply:

"This sounded like racial code language. I pressed him: what did he mean by “a different culture”? Wilson struggled to respond. He said that he meant “pre-gang culture, where you are just running in the streets—not worried about working in the morning, just worried about your immediate gratification.” He added, “It is the same younger culture that is everywhere in the inner cities.”
----
I guess the "right culture" is the one he grew up in. With his non working immediate gratification seeking, gold digging, con artist, mother that he couldn't even trust with his own money.
----
"Most of Wilson’s calls were routine—traffic stops, house alarms—but some were deeply distressing. At one crime scene, he discovered the mangled bodies of two dead women. A two-year-old, “covered in blood,” was crawling between them. I asked him if such incidents made it hard to sleep. “No,” he replied. “I’ve never brought my work home.” This was partly a matter of disposition, but Wilson noted that, while he and Barb were on the force, they lived twenty miles outside Ferguson. They needed “that buffer”—a “chance to get out of that element.”"
------
So. He could not live in the community he served. He thinks the better community is outside of Ferguson, despite the low crime rate they enjoyed before Mike Brown was killed? Hmm.
------
"Wilson’s home life wasn’t entirely peaceful, however. In May, 2013, Barb’s ex-boyfriend John—the father of her younger son, who was then four—assaulted her, and also attacked Wilson. According to court papers, Barb said that John drank, and had beaten her in the past. (Barb asked me to omit John’s surname, to protect her son’s identity.) Barb testified in court that John “pulled my hair,” “choked me,” and “punched me in the face.” "
----
So he lived 20 miles outside of Ferguson and was dealing with this kind of stuff? Where's that "buffer" at?
---

Now he breaks out the tears because nobody will hire him. Seems legit.
Since the anniversary of Michael Brown's death, and the scores of people who have been killed, teargassed, brutalized, since. I have learned one thing and one thing only:

We can't allow people like these to have control over our lives.
How can we trust a system to serve and protect the same people they despise to the point of rejoicing  in their ability to extort, demean, dehumanize and kill. at. will. in order to justify their revenue retrieval disguised under a fraudulent meritocracy narrated by the media under the guise of fairness?

I've been thinking about this for a long time now. And I have a solution.

To be continued...

Black survival- What would it take?

Over the course of...  well..., forever, we've seen

• Black deaths by the hands of police

• Black deaths by the hands of citizens crying wolf from Rosewood to Emmitt Till, to Escambia County, Florida

• Black deaths at the hands of vigilantes (Michael Dunn and George Zimmerman)

• Acts of terrorism inflicted upon Black people due to the forceful removal of the Confederate Flag in South Carolina (see Dylan Roof, and the case where a Black family was threatened while celebrating their child's birthday party)

• The commodification of Black culture

• Cultural appropriation

• Manipulation of the masses via photoshop and fake articles

•  Land grabs initiated by mob justice.

• Extortion.

And since I've blogged about a lot of what's mentioned for over one hundred entries, the questions everybody would ask are, "You got any solutions? What are we going to do about it?"

Here's my answer.

Sometimes I think Black people need our own gated communities.* 

Communities with businesses as well as:

• private police

• hospitals

•  infrastructure (solar panel electricity, heating and cooling, control over our own sewer systems, collecting rain water if necessary. However collecting rainwater is illegal in some states, so a person might want to check with their state to see what they can find.

• private judges, lawyers, prosecutors, etc (an entire judicial system)

• post office

• media outlets (TV, radio, newspaper)

• grocery stores

• farmers

• psychiatrists

• grief counselors 

• credit unions (since banks charge a lot of fees)

• Private tax funds for infrastructure maintenance (roads, etc)

• a national legal team

ALLL located inside the gate, and operating without outside influence. That way the entire economy is controlled by Black people and for Black people. And there's only one way in and out and that's the locked gate.

It sounds extra crazy, but I think that's the only way we'll be able to be protected against White supremacy. We must also make our own laws and everybody must live in the community as well.  An armed private police officer must be present at the entrance at all times, and each and every member of the community has to live in that community. This means if somebody is embezzling money from somewhere, we will know where they live. If votes get rigged, we will know and actual justice will be served.

Where will we go you ask? Well, there are places to start. Any place where there is a high concentration of Black people would work, however, many of those areas are under very crooked local governments that don't have the people in mind, let alone private officers available to make sure justice is handled appropriately. Detroit looks like a great proving ground for such an endeavor. They already have their own private police force so why not start there? Check out this video. Aside from the "Cop Block" advertisement, this video is about starting a private police force, and how to do it successfully. People pay into the service. Those who can't afford it get free service. They can do this because affluent people pay a premium for their service since they're doing such a great job, which means there is a surplus in funds.

I recommend we start in the areas with the highest crime or the most blighted. The reason why I say that is because those are the areas the public police won't go during certain hours. Not only that, but a person could find a lot of vacant lots that could be used for farming and as long as the lot isn't squatted on by an absentee landlord, it could be bought for cheap. A person could put a tiny house on it, equip it with solar panels, and voila! a house with a farm on it that grows vegetables to sell to the local grocery store.

I know what you're thinking. That sounds like a reservation of sorts. Yeah. You're right. It does. But what the Native Americans don't have is complete control over their own economy. Black businesses exist, and we collectively have the buying power of  one trillion dollars. What would happen if we took that out of the current economy?

I hope you don't think I'm crazy for mentioning this. But I am desperate for solutions. I didn't want to wait on someone else to come up with one, so I came up with one the best I could. In a world where we keep getting killed and our lives are in the hands of people who really don't care for our existence anyway, what did I have to lose by trying to find a solution?

Long story short. We've got to survive. People say the whole thing is about class and not race. Well it appears otherwise. And before I protest about something like climate change, and animals getting killed by police or illegal poachers pressed to prove their manhood, I will say the following to those who feel otherwise. :

GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE, SIT YOUR CALLOUS, IGNORANT ASS DOWN, AND GET THE HELL AWAY FROM ME WITH THAT FUCKERY. For real. I have to secure my life before I can do any of that.

I'm not interested in becoming the next hashtag, or mural to be defaced with "All Lives Matter."

We are literally trying to stay alive. And when I use the term "literally" I'm not speaking figuratively.

That is all for now.

We'll see. 

We'll see.

*Updated: 9/28/15 okay, maybe not a literal gated community per se, but we would need our community to be as tight as one without all of the ridiculousness of HOA restrictions.  We can police the areas we already have. We have already created several villages of sorts. We have online presence, and we've linked up with Black owned businesses. All we need is distribution companies, the things mentioned above, and a way to keep funds in Black hands longer (because we know we're subject to city and state tax, water, and utility bills.  As a result, there would be no way of stopping them from raising taxes and or utility costs in order to drive us out like they did in Baltimore, St. Louis, and Detroit).). 

Black Survival- What would it take part 2 (concerns and solutions)

I've privately vetted this idea to a bunch of different people, and they had several questions and concerns, so I decided I'd answer them in another blog entry:

When it comes to biracial people and non-white spouses and stuff like that, how would that be handled?

That's the biggest obstacle I've come across. I am not sure how to handle that, BUT Detroit could serve as a proving ground to see if the idea works. If it works, then people could follow that model and create cities like that all across the country (with a few tweaks of course). 

Imagining the black community as a network, and participants as nodes in that network wherever they are, rather than requiring us all to be in the same place, is very workable in the current environment (given the internet, etc.) and already happening to a certain extent. Efforts that work to build on that community and empower it can find lots of support.

This could definitely work. I think it would be crazy to uproot everybody in the country and send them to Detroit. However these nodes can work if tied together through. I believe if we get Black distribution companies that cater to us by air, rail and truck then those nodes can work to our advantage.

My one worry is that it would go down exactly like all of our other attempts to build something for ourselves. Every Black Wall Street and business district and university has been burned to the ground at least once. And with the new paradigm of anti-"terrorist" rhetoric and legislation, as well as the resurgence of white supremacy, I could see us realistically getting nuked into the Stone Age.

That was my worry as well, BUT if we use Detroit as a proving ground just to see if it will work, then it could be implemented all across the country! We could have black hubs everywhere.
But whatever we do, we need an organization with 501c3 status. This will give rich people the incentive of donating to us and making it tax free for everybody. From there, we could control what the money goes to and where. We will need chapters of this group all over the country. This would be used to fund hospitals, infrastructure, social services, and any other functional elements that require a large amount of capital.  We may also need to do this in secret, meaning no press releases, no going to mainstream media outlets in order to further the cause. We have to do this through conferences, through natural hair expos, etc since these sorts of events are examples of current Black spaces we have at the moment. If we do go to a media outlet, it must be one hundred percent ours. For example, The Final Call is a media one hundred percent Black owned media, and is one of the oldest in the country. Even though some of us might not identify with NOI, we must look past that sort of thing and ask ourselves, "What kind of good do they do, and how can we use that to our advantage?" The same goes with any other outlet ,organization, or group.

Get Oprah and other people to help invest in some type of industry/factory that can employ a bunch of black people and fulfill some type of market niche in the US. There would need to be investors for nice housing developments near the factory.

That sounds like a great idea. It would create reasonable paying jobs and housing for those who want to migrate. A variety of jobs to choose from would definitely be necessary. This may also be where the 501c3 organization would come in. If she donated to it, the tax write off would work for her benefit.

Who is going to be in charge? Police force, judicial system etc. are well and good but who are you suggesting for leadership? 

I think the members of the 501c3 organization will be made up of said people. I'd like it to include a lawyer, a judge, an accountant, a doctor, etc. Basically representatives from each city would work. For example if there are 2 hospitals in each city, then a board member of each hospital will be appointed to meet up wherever the meeting will take place. The accountant from each 501c3 organization will have to go as well.

What happens if people do something corrupt?

Complete transparency is a must! Meaning everybody will receive a quarterly notice of all expenses, including how much everyone makes. This way, all citizens know where the money went, who it went to, why, what, when, which and how it was spent. And they have to live in the city. Once they move, away, they relinquish their position, and another person will be voted in.

I'm interested in this idea of transparency, not so sure about the lack of privacy. When you say 'how much everyone makes etc.' are you saying the council or everyone in the community? You don't think that this type of information will cause problems? 

The Council would be subject to that. The rest of the citizens would be exempt. 

What about non leaders who commit a crime--will they be expected to leave?

However if they compromised the integrity of the community via corruption, fraud and or embezzlement, then they would have to leave,but not before paying the funds back. Otherwise, they may be subject to trial, hearing etc in order to figure out how they will pay the funds back.



So far, these are the main concerns and issues that have been brought to the surface. Surely, there will be more, and I'll keep adding responses and solutions.



*Update: 9/28/15  I figured that we would not be able to make this work if we excluded people. That being said, the "gated community" idea will have to be scrapped, BUT the cohesion would be kept. This means we don't have to have an armed guard available. The community could still function without, but we will still need to make sure our resources stay in Black hands. 

Black survival Part 3 What now?

Remember when I said that Black people should use Detroit as a proving ground to set up a community with our own infrastructure, and then branch outwards?  Well, scratch Detroit off of the list. Apparently Missouri's fuckery is oozing out and affecting the entire midwest region while making north St. Louis County famous again. This time, radioactive waste is leeching into the area, causing the neighboring properties to be contaminated and cancer causing gas to enter the atmosphere. Benzene is steaming out of the soil due to a fire smoldering underneath, and people are breathing it in. People are trying to sell their homes in the area, but are unable to do so. On top of that, the waste has leeched into the local body of water and has flooded the area over several years. This ultimately means the material has escaped the area and will cause further complications down the road. This has been going on for years, but has resurfaced again. Please read the entire post from Senator Maria Chappelle-Nadal, and note the last comment from a former Republic Services* employee :

Despite all of this, Missouri officials say the issue isn't cause for concern. Meanwhile, the area is sitting on smoldering radioactive land, people are inhaling the steam, are dying of cancer, and the groundwater is contaminated.

And they just throw more dirt on top of it like that's going to fix it.

Something tells me the people who say it isn't a real issue are the ones who don't live there.

But they're more than happy to cut corners when it comes to managing the area.

After all of the hell that has gone on with Missouri, St. Louis, and all of the municipalities surrounding it, I came to one conclusion:
The officials in Missouri are so low, and so dirty and so petty that they went through all of that just for money. They leeched off the poor people. Threw tear gas, released tanks, radioactive waste, sprayed people with chemicals , stealing and selling babies, the lies, killing, racism, etc. FOR WHAT??!!!
Money.
But that's okay though. They're building a nine hundred million dollar stadium because "football" and money.
Now an entire section of the country is in danger.
Because money.
Money. Not a supposed deficit in money, but through pilfering and plundering, especially after finding out Edward Meuth senior manager of the St. Louis County Health department had stolen millions of dollars from the budge; a suicide had been claimed to have been made by him after the findings and a note was discovered.

So while looking at the entire scope of things,  I know it would be unrealistic for some of us to be able to leave this country. BUT if we absolutely have to stay, I'd say whatever we decide to do, we must make sure we can find an area with the previous credentials mentioned, in part 1, set up solar panels, and make sure we have as many services as possible that have Black people in mind. By that I mean as many medical services(doctors, gyno, OBGYN, surgeons, pediatricians,) mental health services, businesses, infrastructure,etc.  
Part of me can't believe them raggedy ass pieces of paper were worth that much to these people.  And at the same time, greed will and can make a person do something strange for some change. I can't forget to throw supremacy into the equation because Supremacy is the entire reason why it started and was allowed to continue in the first place.

I've re learned some major things, and this is one of them:
America can be number one with its nuclear waste from the Manhattan project, with its "American values", with its "Dreams", with it's "hard work (at defrauding people under the guise of merit)" and all of that other bullshit.

Fuck substance and decency because money.
And football.
And it's all so disgusting...

And if you choose to leave the country, they'll make sure to rob you for $2350.00 before you go.
Because money*.

*the waste management company assigned for the landfill in question
* I needed to add a red disclaimer to this because I'm sure people will read this and say something like "See? It's class, not race. This is the real problem we should be fighting against!"  I'll stop you right there and say, "That's the supremacy talking. Because if you have to find a way to erase people who don't look like yourself, those who don't look like you can't fight with you if you aren't willing to see the people who don't look like you as equals. You can't fight and truly win a war with invisible soldiers. Truth be told, and long story short, you're looking for 'bodies' not people, and you clearly haven't been paying attention to anything that has been going on up to this point.  Fix supremacy first or GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE WITH THAT BULLSHIT."